关于omaha的专帖

[s:149]

omaha 玩好了赢钱会很容易的!

Rich开的这个关于omaha的专帖，感觉很好，
我也来加几句：
O8：
1): 要注意第三张小牌。so I thin A34x is better to play than A26x.
2): jam the table when you have draw to nut flush, set, in addition to A2xx, or A3xx
3): when have position, play big pairs.

glad to get you interested, but a word of caution for anyone who are thinking about trying PLO. PLO is fun, but kind of addictive (some players refer themself as "omahaolic"). after playing it for a while, I can't seem to play holdem anymore, especially the live cash game. can't stay patient like before. online tourney is still ok, since I usually play 3 or 4 at the same time to keep me busy. I know you are doing pretty well in Holdem MTT. maybe I will meet you at final table on PS someday.

PLO is fun, but kind of addictive, 太赞同这句话了……

rich 前辈，能详细谈谈“plo中的raise对control the pot并不像holdem中那样重要，因而continuation bet 的价值没有holdem那么大” 这两个观点吗？
看card runners 的视频，感觉那些pro的主要利润来源是continuation bet。

rich 前辈，能详细谈谈“plo中的raise对control the pot并不像holdem中那样重要，因而continuation bet 的价值没有holdem那么大” 这两个观点吗？
看card runners 的视频，感觉那些pro的主要利润来源是continuation bet。

这两点本质上是一点。
以最原始的语言，当一个牌手raise before the flop，他是在说：我的牌比你的牌好。在holdem，当一个牌手的牌比另一个牌手的牌好时常常意味他比对手的牌好很多，而在omaha里两者的牌力常常更为接近，所以前者的raise比后者的raise对对手的压力要大很多，pot control/continuation bet 也更有效。

换一种说法，当你preflop 落后，你常常需要flop的帮助才能继续，最好是给你很大的帮助，以至于你的牌从preflop的劣势一方变成flop相近，甚至是的优势一方。在而holdem出现这样情况的机会远远小于omaha。所以，相比于holdem，omaha对flop的依赖更强，对preflop的依赖更弱，自然preflop的action对flop action影响更小。pot control/continuation bet的价值自然就小了。

感觉A26比A34强很多吧
A34 need 2 on the flop

Rich开的这个关于omaha的专帖，感觉很好，
我也来加几句：
O8：
1): 要注意第三张小牌。so I thin A34x is better to play than A26x.
2): jam the table when you have draw to nut flush, set, in addition to A2xx, or A3xx
3): when have position, play big pairs.

[quote="youngtercel":espyhoo5]Pot limit is nearly No Limit practically after flop

i play  Hi/Lo, it is not as boring as Hold'em since you need  a lot analysis of board,

Omaha Hi/lo is not good for live since, a lot of split pot/pot calculation,  Even experience dealer will get confused after a while.

确实有些时候是很confusing。今年wsop在我的桌上出现这样一件事，两个牌手showdown是同样的牌，A2345常说的wheel. dealer很“熟练”地说了一句： same hand，就把pot一分为二，一人一份。结果一位牌手告诉她，是same high and same low, 要先chop high 再chop low，她问了一句：不是一样的吗？花了很长时间才弄明不一定一样。当然，懂这个规矩的牌手也很少，应该不到1%。[/quote:espyhoo5]

你好，我是omaha8的玩家，我没明白你说的话，这个pot应该先chop hi再chop lo？很难理解，我不在这个1％里面。。。反省中 [s:174]

假设这个pot是$90，一分为二每人$45。

Chop high: worse position player got $23, better position player got $22;

Chop low worse position player got $23, better position player got $22;

So one got $46, another got $44; not every one got $45.

确实有些时候是很confusing。今年wsop在我的桌上出现这样一件事，两个牌手showdown是同样的牌，A2345常说的wheel. dealer很“熟练”地说了一句： same hand，就把pot一分为二，一人一份。结果一位牌手告诉她，是same high and same low, 要先chop high 再chop low，她问了一句：不是一样的吗？花了很长时间才弄明不一定一样。当然，懂这个规矩的牌手也很少，应该不到1%。

你好，我是omaha8的玩家，我没明白你说的话，这个pot应该先chop hi再chop lo？很难理解，我不在这个1％里面。。。反省中


假设这个pot是$90，一分为二每人$45。But this is WRONG.

Right one is as follow:

Chop high $45:
Worse position player got $23, better position player got $22;

Chop low $45:
Worse position player got $23, better position player got $22;
So one got $46, another got $44; not every one got $45.